Extra-legal, arbitrary or summary executions: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Extra-legal, arbitrary or summary executions (Quelltext anzeigen)

1.025 Bytes hinzugefügt , 22:40, 7. Sep. 2015

1.005

Bearbeitungen

@@ Zeile 50: / Zeile 50: @@
 within the mandate of the Special Rapporteur”, or of the Commission itself" (E/CN.4/2003/G/80,
 annex)"<ref>[http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G03/172/60/PDF/G0317260.pdf?OpenElement Philip Alston, Report, 22.12.20004, Rn. 49]</ref>.
+In seiner Replik weist Alston darauf hin, dass "humanitarian law" klar zum Mandat des Sonderberichterstatters gehört (Rn.45). Schließlich geht er auf das Verhältnis von humanitärem Völkerrecht und Menschenrechten ein: "The implications of the United States position in this regard would appear to be twofold:
+(i) extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, falling within the Special Rapporteur’s
+mandate, can take place only in situations where international human rights law applies; and
+(ii) where humanitarian law is applicable, it operates to exclude human rights law.
+. Acceptance of this analysis would dramatically reduce the mandate of the Special
+Rapporteur since so many of the executions brought to his attention take place in contexts of
+armed conflict. It would mean that in many situations in which a Government declares itself to
+be under attack and argues that the resulting conflict is governed by the laws of armed conflict,
+the applicability of human rights law would be entirely excluded".
 Report 20.01.2007: "An earlier report examined the law applicable to violations of the right to life in armed