Extra-legal, arbitrary or summary executions: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Extra-legal, arbitrary or summary executions (Quelltext anzeigen)

Version vom 7. September 2015, 22:32 Uhr

889 Bytes entfernt , 22:32, 7. Sep. 2015

→‎Mr. Philip Alston (Australia), August 2004–July 2010

Woozle

1.005

Bearbeitungen

@@ Zeile 39: / Zeile 39: @@
 ===Mr. Philip Alston (Australia), August 2004–July 2010===
-Report 22.12 2004: der Sonderberichterstatter merkt kritisch an, dass illegale Exekutionen mit Hinweis auf die Bekämpfung des Terrorismus gerechtfertigt werden ("targeting and eliminating known terrorists is more efficient and costs fewer lives than waging conventional war").
+Report 22.12 2004: Alston besteht darauf, dass auch der Kampf gegen den Terrorismus sich in einem Rahmen bewegen muss, "clearly governed by human rights law as well as international
-[http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G05/101/34/PDF/G0510134.pdf?OpenElement]
-Und er besteht darauf, dass auch der Kampf gegen den Terrorismus sich in einem Rahmen bewegen muss, "clearly governed by human rights law as well as international
 humanitarian law, and that executions occurring in the context of armed conflict that violate that
 framework fall squarely within the remit of the Special Rapporteur. These issues have assumed
 particular salience in the past couple of years because they have been contested by some
-Governments". Alston geht dann direkt auf die Vereinigten Staaten ein und weist deren Position zurück, wonach der Special Rapporteur oder die Kommission dafür nicht zuständig seien:
+Governments".
-"The most important responses in this regard have come from the Government of
+Alston geht dann direkt auf die Vereinigten Staaten ein, die er wie folgt zitiert: "that since
-the United States in relation to two sets of allegations. The first concerned the alleged killing of
-six men by a “U.S.-controlled Predator drone aircraft” when they were travelling in a car in
-Yemen. At least one of those killed was said to have been a suspected senior figure of Al-Qaida.
-While there was no armed conflict in Yemen at the time, the United States pointed out that since
 Al-Qaida was waging war unlawfully against it, the situation constituted an armed conflict and
 thus “international humanitarian law is the applicable law”. In its view, “allegations stemming