Extra-legal, arbitrary or summary executions: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Zeile 41: Zeile 41:
Report 22.12 2004: der Sonderberichterstatter merkt kritisch an, dass illegale Exekutionen mit Hinweis auf die Bekämpfung des Terrorismus gerechtfertigt werden ("targeting and eliminating known terrorists is more efficient and costs fewer lives than waging conventional war").
Report 22.12 2004: der Sonderberichterstatter merkt kritisch an, dass illegale Exekutionen mit Hinweis auf die Bekämpfung des Terrorismus gerechtfertigt werden ("targeting and eliminating known terrorists is more efficient and costs fewer lives than waging conventional war").
[http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G05/101/34/PDF/G0510134.pdf?OpenElement]
[http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G05/101/34/PDF/G0510134.pdf?OpenElement]
 
Und er besteht darauf, dass auch der Kampf gegen den Terrorismus sich in einem Rahmen bewegen muss, "clearly governed by human rights law as well as international
Report 2005: "to underscore the fact that efforts to eradicate terrorism must be
undertaken within a framework clearly governed by human rights law as well as international
humanitarian law, and that executions occurring in the context of armed conflict that violate that
humanitarian law, and that executions occurring in the context of armed conflict that violate that
framework fall squarely within the remit of the Special Rapporteur. These issues have assumed
framework fall squarely within the remit of the Special Rapporteur. These issues have assumed
particular salience in the past couple of years because they have been contested by some
particular salience in the past couple of years because they have been contested by some
Governments. The most important responses in this regard have come from the Government of
Governments". Alston geht dann direkt auf die Vereinigten Staaten ein und weist deren Position zurück, wonach der Special Rapporteur oder die Kommission dafür nicht zuständig seien:
"The most important responses in this regard have come from the Government of
the United States in relation to two sets of allegations. The first concerned the alleged killing of
the United States in relation to two sets of allegations. The first concerned the alleged killing of
six men by a “U.S.-controlled Predator drone aircraft” when they were travelling in a car in
six men by a “U.S.-controlled Predator drone aircraft” when they were travelling in a car in
Zeile 56: Zeile 55:
from any military operations conducted during the course” of such an armed conflict “do not fall
from any military operations conducted during the course” of such an armed conflict “do not fall
within the mandate of the Special Rapporteur”, or of the Commission itself (E/CN.4/2003/G/80,
within the mandate of the Special Rapporteur”, or of the Commission itself (E/CN.4/2003/G/80,
annex)".
annex)".<ref>[http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G03/172/60/PDF/G0317260.pdf?OpenElement Philip Alston, Report, 22.12.20004, Rn. 49]</ref>.


Report 20.01.2007: "An earlier report examined the law applicable to violations of the right to life in armed
Report 20.01.2007: "An earlier report examined the law applicable to violations of the right to life in armed
1.005

Bearbeitungen