31.738
Bearbeitungen
David Matza: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „'''David Matza''' (* 1. Mai 1930 in New York) ist ein US-amerikanischer Soziologe und Kriminologe. Matza studierte…“) |
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 9: | Zeile 9: | ||
[[Neutralisierung (Kriminologie)|Neutralisierungstheorie]] vor. | [[Neutralisierung (Kriminologie)|Neutralisierungstheorie]] vor. | ||
Darüber hinaus gilt er als einer der frühen Vertreter der [[Kritische Kriminologie|Kritischen Kriminologie]]. | Darüber hinaus gilt er als einer der frühen Vertreter der [[Kritische Kriminologie|Kritischen Kriminologie]]. | ||
"Matza conducts his critique by tracing the development of naturalism in | |||
American criminology. He contends that the development of naturalism is | |||
manifested in progressive adoption of the stances of appreciation of human | |||
deviant behaviour, the description of diversity and sensitivity to complexity. | |||
Appreciation has as its goal understanding the way in which the deviant | |||
actor views his own situation. It involves empathy, intuition and entering the | |||
world of the actor. Appreciation is opposed to a perspective with correctional | |||
aims. T he latter type of perspective has been dominant in criminology and | |||
involves the attempt to predict criminal behaviour; its concern is not with | |||
understanding as such but rather with the elucidation of causal factors | |||
to be used in the control of deviant behaviour. Appreciation involves a | |||
recognition of the diversity of human behaviour but implicit in a | |||
correctional viewpoint is the notion of pathology; the idea that there are | |||
essentially two types of person, the deviant and the non-deviant, to be distinguished on the basis of differential etiology. This distinction implies that | |||
either the deviant or his social world are in some sense abnormal. T he | |||
simple bifurcation it creates does violence to the complexity of the relationship between deviant and non-deviant phenomena in the real world. It is | |||
fairly clear t h at Matza holds the methodological directives of naturalism | |||
and " scientism " to be mutually exclusive: " The basic difficulty with a | |||
correctional perspective is that it systematically interferes with the capacity | |||
to empathise and thus comprehend the subject of inquiry." | |||
== Werke (Auswahl) == | == Werke (Auswahl) == | ||
| Zeile 17: | Zeile 38: | ||
== Weblinks == | == Weblinks == | ||
* [http://sociology.berkeley.edu/profiles/matza/cv.pdf Vita: David Matza (University of California, Berkeley)] | * [http://sociology.berkeley.edu/profiles/matza/cv.pdf Vita: David Matza (University of California, Berkeley)] | ||
*[http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/content/15/2/111.full.pdf BRIT. J. OUMINOL. Vol. 15 No. a APRIL 1975 MAN AND METHOD IN DAVID MATZA'S "BECOMING D E V I A N T" DERYCK BEYLEVELD AND PAUL WILES] | |||
{{SORTIERUNG:Matza, David}} | {{SORTIERUNG:Matza, David}} | ||