31.738
Bearbeitungen
Social and Legal Limits of Drug Law Reform (USP): Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Social and Legal Limits of Drug Law Reform (USP) (Quelltext anzeigen)
Version vom 18. April 2018, 00:15 Uhr
, 00:15, 18. Apr. 2018→Death, Guilt, and Accountability
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 18: | Zeile 18: | ||
But what if they have a right to use drugs? (Douglas Husak). In that case, the law would have to allow drug use and drug commerce. How would that affect violence? | But what if they have a right to use drugs? (Douglas Husak). In that case, the law would have to allow drug use and drug commerce. How would that affect violence? | ||
Suspect 2: Prohibition of goods and services creates a black market, which in turn creates structures and profits for organized crime. Lack of access to legal conflict regulation leads to violent | Suspect 2: Prohibition of goods and services creates a black market, which in turn creates structures and profits for organized crime. Lack of access to legal conflict regulation leads to violent internal sanctions as well as turf wars for domination and demarcation of markets. | ||
Suspect 3: Legislators responsible for law-making. Legal reform could re-create more peaceful conditions. It is their responsibility to do something. But why don't they? | Suspect 3: Legislators responsible for law-making. Legal reform could re-create more peaceful conditions. It is their responsibility to do something. But why don't they? | ||