Robert J. Sampson: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Zeile 57: Zeile 57:
*Sampson, Robert J., 2006. Commentary: "'Bowling Alone?': Civil Society May Not be in Such Bad Shape" in Stanford Social Innovation Review (Summer 2006).
*Sampson, Robert J., 2006. Commentary: "'Bowling Alone?': Civil Society May Not be in Such Bad Shape" in Stanford Social Innovation Review (Summer 2006).


"Another aim of the CCCP is to argue that the disproportionate attention accorded the struggles of the sixties has created a stylized image of social movements that threatens to distort our understanding of popular contention, not only in earlier periods and in non-democratic contexts, but also in the contemporary U.S. This stylized view tends to equate movements with (a) disruptive protest in public settings, (b) loosely coordinated national struggles over political issues, (c) urban and/or campus based protest activities, and (d) claims-making by disadvantaged minorities. Drawing on nearly 1,000 protest events between 1970-2000 collected in the Chicago Chicago Civic Participation Study, we find the data do not support the common imagery of social movements. Since 1980 there has been a marked transformation of the movement form to the point where public protest is now largely peaceful, routine, suburban, local in nature, and initiated by the advantaged."


*McAdam, Doug, Robert Sampson, Simon Weffer, and Heather MacIndoe. 2005. "There Will Be Fighting in the Streets: The Distorting Lens of Social Movement Theory." Mobilization 10:1-18.
*McAdam, Doug, Robert Sampson, Simon Weffer, and Heather MacIndoe. 2005. "There Will Be Fighting in the Streets: The Distorting Lens of Social Movement Theory." Mobilization 10:1-18.
31.738

Bearbeitungen