Restorative Justice: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Zeile 141: Zeile 141:
:The book transcends the debate between theories of punishment with a comprehensive theory of criminal justice generally, the goal of which  should be to maximize dominion (i.e. freedom, holistically conceived). A republican conception of freedom within a social world yields presumptions in favor of: parsimony, the checking of state power over individuals, reprobation, and reintegration of victims and offenders.  
:The book transcends the debate between theories of punishment with a comprehensive theory of criminal justice generally, the goal of which  should be to maximize dominion (i.e. freedom, holistically conceived). A republican conception of freedom within a social world yields presumptions in favor of: parsimony, the checking of state power over individuals, reprobation, and reintegration of victims and offenders.  
*Christie, Nils (2006) Restorative Justice: Five Dangers Ahead. Oslo: Manuskript.
*Christie, Nils (2006) Restorative Justice: Five Dangers Ahead. Oslo: Manuskript.
*[http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1529&context=wlucdj Grunewald, Kristen F., Priya Nath (2003) Defense-Based Victim Outreach: Restorative Justice in Capital Cases. Capital Defense Journal]
*Hagemann, Otmar (2000) Restorative Justice in Prisons? In: L. Walgrave (ed.), Repositioning Restorative Justice. Collumpton: Willan Publishing: 221-236.
*Hagemann, Otmar (2000) Restorative Justice in Prisons? In: L. Walgrave (ed.), Repositioning Restorative Justice. Collumpton: Willan Publishing: 221-236.
*Morris, Ruth (1999) Why Transformative Justice? Toronto: Rittenhouse.
*Morris, Ruth (1999) Why Transformative Justice? Toronto: Rittenhouse.
31.738

Bearbeitungen