Largo São Francisco: Police

The Scope of Policing

Das so genannte Kreuzbergerkenntnis (auch: Kreuzbergurteil) ist ein Urteil des Preußischen Oberverwaltungsgerichts mit Sitz in Berlin vom 14. Juni 1882, mit dem das Gericht die polizeiliche Gewalt einschränkte, um die Gewaltenteilung zu gewährleisten, und die Entpolizeilichung der öffentlichen Verwaltung einleitete.

In der Sache ging es darum, dass das Polizeipräsidium Berlin eine Verordnung erlassen hatte, die den Eigentümern der Grundstücke rund um den Berliner Kreuzberg verbot, Gebäude über einer bestimmten Höhe zu errichten. Zweck dieses Verbots war, die Sicht auf das bereits 1821 errichtete Nationaldenkmal für die Befreiungskriege freizuhalten. Dem Eigentümer eines nahegelegenen Grundstücks war deswegen eine Baugenehmigung versagt worden, wogegen er geklagt hatte.

Das Oberverwaltungsgericht erklärte die Polizeiverordnung für unwirksam mit dem Argument, die Baupolizei sei nur für die Abwehr von Gefahren zuständig, nicht aber für die Wahrung ästhetischer Interessen.

Das Urteil war insofern bahnbrechend, als es klarstellte, dass stadtplanerische Gestaltung nicht zu den Aufgaben der Polizei gehört. Politikgeschichtlich war es ein Zeichen für das Ende des Polizeistaates absolutistischer Prägung, in dessen Verständnis „Polizei“ so viel bedeutete wie „eine gute Ordnung“, auch einschließlich dazugehöriger Wohlfahrtsaufgaben (Wohlfahrtspflege). Das Aktionsfeld der Polizei wurde damit auf die Aufgabe begrenzt, gesetzwidrigen Handlungen oder Zuständen entgegenzutreten; die (aktive) Gestaltung des sozialen Lebens wurde ihr dadurch versagt.

Police and Policing

The police is a governmental institution with the obligation to work for order and security, to assist in the search and arrest of criminal suspects, and with the right to use force. Reacting to the occurrence of crimes is by far not the only function of the police.

Policing involves much more than the enforcement of penal laws. There is good reason to believe, and it seems that Cifford Shearing does, that quite a few policing functions could be fulfilled equally well or better by community members themselves instead of, but in cooperation with the police.

Therefore, policing is not necessarily and uniquely a task for the police. There could also be policing carried out by individuals and groups of a given community itself.

Law Enforcement and Policing

BY TIMOTHY ROUFA Updated January 24, 2018

Often when we discuss criminal justice systems, strategies and even professions, the terms law enforcement and policing are used interchangeably. Though to some the two concepts may seem to be the same or - at most - a difference without distinction, to criminology practitioners the terms have very big and very important differences.

For those of you interested in pursuing careers in criminal justice or criminology, you should learn what the difference is between law enforcement and policing and why the distinction matters

Concept of Law Enforcement. At its core, the concept of law enforcement consists of just that: enforcing laws. In its purest form, "law enforcement" requires an unwavering adherence to rules and procedures. It is a focus on the letter of the law rather than the spirit of the law. Citations are issued, arrests are made, and force is employed with little regard for the reason or meaning behind a particular law or policy.

Law enforcement can be a very effective way to maintain public order and punish crime inasmuch as it is focused on requiring the members of a community or society to comply with the law or face the consequences. The problem of law enforcement alone as a response to crime is that it is singular in its approach, responding to effects without consideration for causes.

Concept of Policing. The term policing has come to mean an approach to crime fighting through community service and problem-solving.

The idea of policing requires a holistic approach to community service, taking into account the problems that plague a community and working with the people within that community to solve them.

Policing requires cooperation from stakeholders- residents, business owner, and leaders - participate in the process of reducing crime and improving quality of life.

While it may seem at the time this newly envisioned idea of policing as a societal function as opposed to being reserved for law enforcement departments alone is only beginning to gain traction, in fact, it hearkens to the earliest days of the modern police force. The concept is best articulated in Sir Robert Peel's 9 principles of policing.

Difference Between Law Enforcement and Policing. While there may be a temptation to believe the two concepts are one and the same, or even two sides of the same coin, in truth the difference goes deeper. Whereas law enforcement implies compulsory compliance, policing suggests voluntary adherence. In that sense, law enforcement is but one component of policing, one of many tools in the toolbox available to police officers and law enforcement agencies.

Why Does Knowing the Difference Matter? In the current environment, particularly in the United States, there is a perception that a gulf has emerged between police departments and their communities. By focusing solely on law enforcement, as opposed to the holistic approach of community policing, officers risk widening the gulf.

Taking a law enforcement-only approach to fighting crime can encourage an us-against-them mentality, both in officers and the members of the public they serve.

When police look to work within their communities to solve problems and fight crime together, it encourages participation and ownership for all parties and helps foster trust between officers and the general public.

Contents: Alex Vitale, social cohesion, option between increased brutalization and increased social cooperation shearing