Green Criminology: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

181 Bytes hinzugefügt ,  13:31, 8. Nov. 2009
Zeile 46: Zeile 46:
* Benton, T. (1998). Rights and Justice on a Shared Planet:: More Rights or New Relations? Theoretical Criminology, 2 (2), 149-175.
* Benton, T. (1998). Rights and Justice on a Shared Planet:: More Rights or New Relations? Theoretical Criminology, 2 (2), 149-175.
*Carrabine, Eamonn et al. (2004), The Greening of Criminology (Chapter 17). In: Carrabine, Eamonn et al. (2004), Criminology – A Sociological Introduction (S. 313-330). London: Routledge. (siehe Weblinks)
*Carrabine, Eamonn et al. (2004), The Greening of Criminology (Chapter 17). In: Carrabine, Eamonn et al. (2004), Criminology – A Sociological Introduction (S. 313-330). London: Routledge. (siehe Weblinks)
* de Prez, P. (2006). Excuses, Excuses: The Ritual Trivialisation of Environmental Prosecutions. In N. South, & P. Beirne, Green Criminology (International library of criminology, criminal justice and penology. Second series) (S. 395-409). London: Ashgate.  
* de Prez, P. (2006). Excuses, Excuses: The Ritual Trivialisation of Environmental Prosecutions. In N. South, & P. Beirne, Green Criminology (International library of criminology, criminal justice and penology. Second series) (S. 395-409). London: Ashgate.
* Gibbs, C., Gore, M.L. et al. (2009) Introducing Conservation Criminology. Towards Interdisciplinary Scholarship on Environemntal Crimes and Risks. British Journal of Criminology.  
* Halsey, Mark (1997). Environmental Crime: Towards an Eco-Human Rights Approach. Current Issues in Criminal Justice , 8 (3), S. 217-243.
* Halsey, Mark (1997). Environmental Crime: Towards an Eco-Human Rights Approach. Current Issues in Criminal Justice , 8 (3), S. 217-243.
* Halsey, Mark (1999). Environmental Discontinuities: The Production and Regulation of an Eco-experience. Criminal Justice Policy Review , 10 (2), 213-255.  
* Halsey, Mark (1999). Environmental Discontinuities: The Production and Regulation of an Eco-experience. Criminal Justice Policy Review , 10 (2), 213-255.  
31.738

Bearbeitungen