31.738
Bearbeitungen
Crisis and Criminal Justice: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Crisis and Criminal Justice (Quelltext anzeigen)
Version vom 16. Mai 2018, 09:15 Uhr
, 09:15, 16. Mai 2018keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (Tiao verschob die Seite IBCCrim: Crisis and Criminal Justice nach Crisis and Criminal Justice) |
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 34: | Zeile 34: | ||
Social policy Brazil: PEC 55 20 years freeze on social and educational spending. (Dec. 2016). | Social policy Brazil: PEC 55 20 years freeze on social and educational spending. (Dec. 2016). | ||
== Polarisation of Drug Policies == | == Prisons and the Polarisation of Drug Policies == | ||
'''Zone of War.''' | |||
And, every year, this report is, unfortunately, hardly a surprise – we read about | |||
the degrading conditions in which people are imprisoned, and about | |||
their growing number. Yet the level | |||
of crime in most societies is constantly decreasing. The question that remains unanswered, therefore, is why our societies focus their response to unlawful behaviours so often on prison? Where is the proportionality | |||
in sentencing when we punish non- violent offences with lengthy prison sentences? Is this the only response we can offer? | |||
The chapter on drugs and imprisonment in this report highlights that a high number of prisons in the world are overcrowded due to the incarceration of people for drug-related offences, in particular non-violent offences involving use and possession for personal use. This directly | |||
re ects our contemporary addiction | |||
to punishment and showcases the disproportionality of punishment in relation to the offence. The use of harsh prison sentences for people | |||
who use drugs or for those who play | |||
a minor role in the drug trade also shows the inef ciency, limitations and perverse effects of current drug control policies. Not only are punishment | |||
and incarceration becoming the sole instruments used to enforce the law, but also they are serving to implement moral norms which have no link with the reality of the offence that they are supposed to punish. | |||
This trend of over-incarceration and punishment of people who use drugs is seen on every continent. The deep impact it has on prison systems | |||
and on people in prison and their communities has sparked the current global debate on drug policy reform. In recent years, more and more countries have been introducing amendments | |||
to their drug laws; for example, by decriminalising the use of drugs | |||
in Norway and Colombia, and by replacing prison terms with monetary nes in Ghana and Tunisia or with community service, as envisaged | |||
in Senegal. Other countries have | |||
gone even further. Ecuador gave an amnesty to drug couriers and released thousands of prisoners. Countries | |||
that have traditionally adopted harsh stances on drugs, such as Malaysia and Iran, are reviewing their death penalty policies for drug offences, | |||
and removing people from death row. | |||
These changes and reforms are | |||
being discussed and implemented | |||
in a global environment that remains highly stigmatising, where drugs are still considered ‘evil’ and prohibition approaches prevail. They are therefore born out of a real need – the need for societies to stop exposing their citizens to greater risks from arrests related to drug use than come from the act of using drugs. | |||
The need for reforms was also highlighted at the UN General Assembly Special Session on Drugs held in 2016. In their decisions there, member states called for more proportionate sentencing and for alternatives to incarceration. At the Global Commission on Drug Policy, | |||
we call for these commitments to be implemented, taking account of the fact that over-incarceration as | |||
a result of out-of-date drug policies stalls progress on implementing the Sustainable Development Goals, notably for Goal 3 on health, Goal 5 on gender equality, Goal 10 on reducing inequality, and Goal 16 on peaceful societies. | |||
Drug policies need reforms, and there are two urgent ones to enact. First, we need to accept that behaviours and actions of others that are not aligned with our own moral perspectives do not need to be turned into criminal offences. Second, we need to introduce proportionate sentencing and alternatives to imprisonment for minor drug supply-related offences. This will ease pressure on prison systems so that they can ful l their purpose as set down in the UN Nelson Mandela Rules: to play a rehabilitative role and focus on social reintegration, and to distance from the criminal justice system those who should not be subject to it, including people who use drugs. | |||
Rt Hon Helen Clark | |||
Member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy; Former Prime Minister of New Zealand, 1999–2008; Former Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2009–2017.'''Zone of War.''' | |||
From: Foreword to Global Prison Trends 2018 pdf. | |||
Increasing number of states introduce death penalty in response to inefficient drug policy. From 10 to 33 between the 1970s and today. | Increasing number of states introduce death penalty in response to inefficient drug policy. From 10 to 33 between the 1970s and today. | ||