Benutzer Diskussion:Woozle/Against Penitentiaries: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Zeile 2: Zeile 2:
'''Davids Scott (ed.) Why prisons?,''' Cambridge 2015  
'''Davids Scott (ed.) Why prisons?,''' Cambridge 2015  
The book features original essays by, e.g. De Giorgi, Wacquant, Michelle Brown, Joe Sim  u.a. and a foreword by  
The book features original essays by, e.g. De Giorgi, Wacquant, Michelle Brown, Joe Sim  u.a. and a foreword by  
Thomas Mathiesen ("Can we stem the tide"), in which he suggests a number of sociologically informed strategies "to lower or at least significantly slow down the increase in numbers of prisoners per capita in a society" (XX). A surprisingly modest proposal for the Grand Abolitionist. All the moire interesting are his suggestions: "foster confidence in others", "the police should be largely unarmed...police officers should be visible and polite rather than driving around in closed cars", "there are aspects of togetherness that should be fostered", "This involves a limitation on controlled city life, and an expansion of a social city life" (XXI).
''Thomas Mathiesen'' ("Can we stem the tide"), in which he suggests a number of sociologically informed strategies "to lower or at least significantly slow down the increase in numbers of prisoners per capita in a society" (XX). A surprisingly modest proposal for the Grand Abolitionist. All the moire interesting are his suggestions: "foster confidence in others", "the police should be largely unarmed...police officers should be visible and polite rather than driving around in closed cars", "there are aspects of togetherness that should be fostered", "This involves a limitation on controlled city life, and an expansion of a social city life" (XXI).
Part V of the book (Abolitionist Alternatives) includes the following three contribution:
Part V of the book (Abolitionist Alternatives) includes the following three contribution:
* Erica Meiners, Professor of education and gender and women's studies at Northeastern Illinois University, writes about "Schooling the carceral state: challenging the school-to-prison-pipeline". She believes that "it is not enough to take down prisons" (277). She advocates "building other sustainable frameworks for public safety and engaging the question of why prisons have been naturalized as responses to harm in our communities" (276). Prisons "cannot be eliminated unless new institutions and resources are made available to those communities that provide, in large part, the human beings that make up the prison population" (277).
* ''Erica Meiners'', Professor of education and gender and women's studies at Northeastern Illinois University, writes about "Schooling the carceral state: challenging the school-to-prison-pipeline". She believes that "it is not enough to take down prisons" (277). She advocates "building other sustainable frameworks for public safety and engaging the question of why prisons have been naturalized as responses to harm in our communities" (276). Prisons "cannot be eliminated unless new institutions and resources are made available to those communities that provide, in large part, the human beings that make up the prison population" (277).


* [[Julia C. Oparah]] is professor and chair of Ethnic Studies at Mills College. She is maybe better known as Julia Sudbury (with a number of abolitionist publiations, in Social Justice and elsewhare). Here she deals with the Topic "Why no prisons?". She reports about the new Abolitionist movement in the USA (Critical Resistance), which holds annual metings since 1998. CR's analysis of the political economy of prisons was shaped by Linda Evans and Angela Y. Davis. "One of the most effective strategies used by Critical Resistance to win Support for the Abolition rather than reform of prisons is to Point to a continuity between slavery and contemporary incarceration" (283). But aren't there some people who really need to be locked up? CR's answers and strategies are to be found in "The Abolitionist Toolkit"(2012) [http://criticalresistance.org/resources/the-abolitionist-toolkit/]). Oparah (298) shares the activists' belief in a three step strategy of prison abolition: STOP (moratorium), SHRINK (decarceration), BUILD (alternative way to built security and address harm).
* [[''Julia C. Oparah'']] is professor and chair of Ethnic Studies at Mills College. She is maybe better known as Julia Sudbury (with a number of abolitionist publiations, in Social Justice and elsewhare). Here she deals with the Topic "Why no prisons?". She reports about the new Abolitionist movement in the USA (Critical Resistance), which holds annual metings since 1998. CR's analysis of the political economy of prisons was shaped by Linda Evans and Angela Y. Davis. "One of the most effective strategies used by Critical Resistance to win Support for the Abolition rather than reform of prisons is to Point to a continuity between slavery and contemporary incarceration" (283). But aren't there some people who really need to be locked up? CR's answers and strategies are to be found in "The Abolitionist Toolkit"(2012) [http://criticalresistance.org/resources/the-abolitionist-toolkit/]). Oparah (298) shares the activists' belief in a three step strategy of prison abolition: STOP (moratorium), SHRINK (decarceration), BUILD (alternative way to built security and address harm).


* David Scott, is Senior lecturer of criminology at Liverpool John Moores University. First of all, he makes an argument to distinguish prisons "from other sites of state detention (and other social institutions)". "Pain and the allocation of blame are the very reasons why prisons exist (Christie 1981)"(302). Scott has created the term "abolitionist compass" (in Malloch & Munro, eds. Crime, Critique and Utopia. London , 2013), a normative framework "to assist our navigation away from deeply entrenched social inequalities and the problems associated with the criminal process" 313). His "abolitionist real utopia" (315) requires "at least nine interlinked strategic objectives:
* David Scott, is Senior lecturer of criminology at Liverpool John Moores University. First of all, he makes an argument to distinguish prisons "from other sites of state detention (and other social institutions)". "Pain and the allocation of blame are the very reasons why prisons exist (Christie 1981)"(302). Scott has created the term "abolitionist compass" (in Malloch & Munro, eds. Crime, Critique and Utopia. London , 2013), a normative framework "to assist our navigation away from deeply entrenched social inequalities and the problems associated with the criminal process" 313). His "abolitionist real utopia" (315) requires "at least nine interlinked strategic objectives:
Zeile 29: Zeile 29:


Author's summary: "An 'abolitionist real utopia' requires immediate direct policy interventions alongside the fostering of community-based social movements that can join forces in struggles for freedom and recognition of human dignity for all. Anti-prison activists and theorists must continue to aspire to live in, and fight for, a ''world without prisons'' alongside advocating nonpunitive interventions rooted in immanent possibilities that can start to roll back the penal colonisation of the life world" (323 f).
Author's summary: "An 'abolitionist real utopia' requires immediate direct policy interventions alongside the fostering of community-based social movements that can join forces in struggles for freedom and recognition of human dignity for all. Anti-prison activists and theorists must continue to aspire to live in, and fight for, a ''world without prisons'' alongside advocating nonpunitive interventions rooted in immanent possibilities that can start to roll back the penal colonisation of the life world" (323 f).
There is another pertinent article in this volume:
* ''Mark Brown'', teaches criminology at Melbourne. Behind the title "The iron cage of prison studies" hides a fundamental critique of traditional prison studies. Three chapter:
- a theoretical rationale to extend the prison's normative frame to a wider study of detention and confinement
- varieties of imprisonment (e.g. "post-sentence detention"; "immigration detention"; "international zones" (at Airports and other embarkation points)
- theorisation: toward a post-penal account of confinement "albeit perhaps with the prison at ist centre" (164).
- Author's resumee: the "Need to find a theoretical Framework that caan both conceive the airport international Zone to the domestic prison, while at the same timeexplaining the role of that local prison as a Kind of ideal type of the confinement milieu, providing important Inspiration and guide to form while at the same time being not quite suitable for the diversity of confining Impulses abounding in the contemporary world" (169)


== Neue Struktur ==
== Neue Struktur ==
1.005

Bearbeitungen