Benutzer Diskussion:Tiao/China: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Benutzer Diskussion:Tiao/China (Quelltext anzeigen)

1 Byte hinzugefügt , 12:27, 22. Aug. 2016

keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung

1.005

Bearbeitungen

Version vom 22. August 2016, 12:26 Uhr (Quelltext anzeigen) Woozle (Diskussion \| Beiträge) ← Zum vorherigen Versionsunterschied		Version vom 22. August 2016, 12:27 Uhr (Quelltext anzeigen) Woozle (Diskussion \| Beiträge) Zum nächsten Versionsunterschied →
Zeile 3:		Zeile 3:
	Thank you. Is there a criterion that excludes Romani from being counted as autochthone? Have they not spoken Romani languages in Germany incessantly for some 600 years?		Thank you. Is there a criterion that excludes Romani from being counted as autochthone? Have they not spoken Romani languages in Germany incessantly for some 600 years?

	Yes, by they are not seen as a "German" minority (like the Sorbs, Friesians etc.), but as European vagrants, moving crap game. There was a lot of political pressure on the German government to include at least the Roma in the list of autochthonos minorities. Instead the German government compromised on some points (which I do not remember). [[Benutzer:Woozle\|Woozle]] 12:26, 22. Aug. 2016 (CEST)		Yes, by they are not seen as a "German" minority (like the Sorbs, Friesians etc.), but as European vagrants, a moving crap game. There was a lot of political pressure on the German government to include at least the Roma in the list of autochthonos minorities. Instead the German government compromised on some points (which I do not remember). [[Benutzer:Woozle\|Woozle]] 12:26, 22. Aug. 2016 (CEST)