1.005
Bearbeitungen
Benutzer Diskussion:Tiao/China: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Benutzer Diskussion:Tiao/China (Quelltext anzeigen)
Version vom 22. August 2016, 12:26 Uhr
, 12:26, 22. Aug. 2016keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Woozle (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
In Germany, minority protection is bound to autochthone, i.e. | In Germany, minority protection is bound to autochthone, i.e. indigene minorities. Therefore, the Roma/Sinti languages (Romani) are not covered by the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europ%C3%A4ische_Charta_der_Regional-_oder_Mi.nderheitensprachen).[[Benutzer:Woozle|Woozle]] 12:26, 22. Aug. 2016 (CEST) | ||
Thank you. Is there a criterion that excludes Romani from being counted as autochthone? Have they not spoken Romani languages in Germany incessantly for some 600 years? | Thank you. Is there a criterion that excludes Romani from being counted as autochthone? Have they not spoken Romani languages in Germany incessantly for some 600 years? | ||
Yes, by they are not seen as a "German" minority (like the Sorbs, Friesians etc.), but as European vagrants, moving crap game. There was a lot of political pressure on the German government to include at least the Roma in the list of autochthonos minorities. Instead the German government compromised on some points (which I do not remember). [[Benutzer:Woozle|Woozle]] 12:26, 22. Aug. 2016 (CEST) | |||