1.005
Bearbeitungen
Woozle (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Woozle (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
Zeile 229: | Zeile 229: | ||
It is difficult when we start thinking not of buildings, but of inmates. A serious answer to the question needs some reflection and - above all - differentiation. As a matter of fact, to find out what can and should be done about today’s prison population (and their future equivalents) might require that we first take a step back, calm down, and think about - what it does not mean to abolish prisons. | It is difficult when we start thinking not of buildings, but of inmates. A serious answer to the question needs some reflection and - above all - differentiation. As a matter of fact, to find out what can and should be done about today’s prison population (and their future equivalents) might require that we first take a step back, calm down, and think about - what it does not mean to abolish prisons. | ||
First and foremost, to abolish prisons does not mean to abolish all kinds of involuntary confinement. | First and foremost, to abolish prisons does not mean to abolish all kinds of involuntary confinement. | ||
That might sound strange at first, but it becomes less so when we realize that “imprisonment” and “involuntary confinement” are not synonymous. As a matter of fact, “imprisonment” is only one (albeit outstanding) example of procedures, contexts, and institutions which restrict people’s freedom of movement against their will. | That might sound strange at first, but it becomes less so when we realize that “imprisonment” and “involuntary confinement” are not synonymous. As a matter of fact, “imprisonment” is only one (albeit outstanding) example of procedures, contexts, and institutions which restrict people’s freedom of movement against their will. |
Bearbeitungen