31.738
Bearbeitungen
Abolitionism: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
→Cause for Conflict
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 172: | Zeile 172: | ||
==== Cause for Conflict==== | ==== Cause for Conflict==== | ||
*Christie: Limits to Pain | *Christie: Limits to Pain | ||
*Poor quality of Conflict Resolution (wenn die Konflikte den Leuten gehören, nicht dem Staat, ist das relevant) | |||
*Questioning the State's Competency and Right to Punish | *Questioning the State's Competency and Right to Punish | ||
*Catascopic and anascopic views | *Catascopic and anascopic views | ||
| Zeile 181: | Zeile 182: | ||
*To do away with reifications of everyday thinking | *To do away with reifications of everyday thinking | ||
As a matter of fact, the ICOPA was renamed to encompass an even larger spectrum of demands. Instead of making halt at the demand to abolish prisons, the organization now envisaged to abolish the whole of the criminal justice system, including criminal law and criminal trials. One of the proponents of this enlargement of perspective was Louk Hulsman. Together with Nils Christie and Thomas Mathiesen from Norway, Hulsman is being seen as one of the most influential contemporary abolitionists. | As a matter of fact, the ICOPA was renamed to encompass an even larger spectrum of demands. Instead of making halt at the demand to abolish prisons, the organization now envisaged to abolish the whole of the criminal justice system, including criminal law and criminal trials. One of the proponents of this enlargement of perspective was Louk Hulsman. Together with Nils Christie and Thomas Mathiesen from Norway, Hulsman is being seen as one of the most influential contemporary abolitionists. | ||
==== Controversies==== | ==== Controversies==== | ||
Controversies surrounding the abolitionist agenda today center on the question of idealism, utopianism, and on the question of the rule of law. Some emancipatory movements are investing their hopes into participatory power In the state and legal apparatus, and thus aim at enshrining their beliefs and values in the criminal law instead of abolishing the penal codes. This weakened the abolitionist movement, but the last word has not been spoken on this matter. | Controversies surrounding the abolitionist agenda today center on the question of idealism, utopianism, and on the question of the rule of law. Some emancipatory movements are investing their hopes into participatory power In the state and legal apparatus, and thus aim at enshrining their beliefs and values in the criminal law instead of abolishing the penal codes. This weakened the abolitionist movement, but the last word has not been spoken on this matter. | ||