Aktualität und Zukunft des Abolitionismus: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Tiao (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| Zeile 18: | Zeile 18: | ||
**taking specific groups of people out of prison by principle (young offenders, old offenders, pregnant women, psychiatric cases) | **taking specific groups of people out of prison by principle (young offenders, old offenders, pregnant women, psychiatric cases) | ||
**taking out specific crimes by de-criminalization (drugs, ...) | **taking out specific crimes by de-criminalization (drugs, ...) | ||
== Tendencies and Counter-Tendencies == | |||
The Trend away from Total Institutions | |||
Mass incarceration | |||
Mass misery at the margins | |||
Version vom 19. November 2014, 18:29 Uhr
Elective Affinities
- Deleuze: Prisons belong to the Age of Discipline (after Sovereignty and Before Control)
- Today these elective affinities are withering away. Look at the dissolution of other total institutions.
- Access Society, Identification, surveillance, case work: look at FIFA
Two Ways of Attacking the Prison
Directly
- De-legitimizing deprivation of liberty (confinement in penal institutions) as criminal punishment. Analogy to attacking violations of the human body (amputations, executions etc.) as a punishment.
Indirectly
- Drying out:
- taking specific groups of people out of prison by principle (young offenders, old offenders, pregnant women, psychiatric cases)
- taking out specific crimes by de-criminalization (drugs, ...)
Tendencies and Counter-Tendencies
The Trend away from Total Institutions
Mass incarceration
Mass misery at the margins
Weblinks und Literatur
- Deleuze
- Feest & Paul (org.): Does Abolitionism Have A Future?